last
updated 22nd September 05
by 4ecotips.com
Important
project seeks ongoing funding
The waters of Monterey Bay on America's
Pacific coast, south of San Francisco,
holds some vital clues to the development
of global warming. Moss Landing Marine
Laboratories is closely involved in
important research in the area and
the organisation's Larry Breaker says
that preliminary results suggest "the
warming process has not been gradual
and continuous but, rather, non-uniform
and step-like!"
Now Larry (lbreaker@mlml.calstate.edu)
is looking for urgent funding to support
his ongoing research, which he confidently
believes, will have "important
implications for how the process of
global warming manifests itself in
the ocean." He has completed
a preliminary report on the research
so far entitled "How the waters
of Monterey Bay have warmed during
the past century". Here are some
technical extracts:
Daily sea surface temperatures (SSTs)
have been acquired at the Hopkins
Marine Station in Pacific Grove at
the southern end of Monterey Bay since
1919. Because of its length, this
record is well suited to the study
of long-term changes within, and possibly
well beyond, the bay.
Three models are employed to explain
how the waters of Monterey Bay have
warmed over the past century, linear,
nonlinear, and step-wise. The linear
model is based on linear least-squares
regression, the nonlinear model on
robust, locally weighted regression
(Loess), and the step-wise model on
change points identified using Cumulative
Sums (CUSUMs).
Three, and possibly five, change
points were detected that correspond
to known regime shifts. The performance
of these models was evaluated using
residual sums of squares, and an eigenvalue
decomposition of the models after
CUSUMs were calculated. Both methods
indicate that the step-wise model
provides the best fit to the observations.
Because two of the changes were relatively
small (< 0.2oC), the 5-step model
provides only marginal improvement
over a 3-step model. The step-wise
model not only provides the best fit
to the observations but it is also
the most parsimonious. Although several
of the step increases were small,
all changes were positive yielding
an overall increase of greater than
1.1oC since 1920. Because all of the
observed changes in temperature were
positive, we propose that they could
reflect the influence of larger-scale
thermal forcing rather than stochastic
forcing.
Using CUSUMs, events were detected
that correspond to change points and
in some cases to regime shifts in
the record. CUSUMs produce a distinct
pattern that may be characteristic
of regime shifts. These patterns,
on closer inspection, often contain
two change points separated by periods
of roughly six months.
In 1939, 1976, and 1999, events were
identified that coincide closely with
reported regime shifts. An abrupt
increase in SST was also detected
in 1929 that may correspond to the
phase shift in the Pacific Decadal
Oscillation (PDO) that occurred circa
1925.
Similar CUSUM patterns were observed
in the daily record of SST at Scripps
Pier located 550 km south of Monterey
Bay. Events in 1939 and 1976 were
similar and essentially in phase,
whereas the events in 1929 and 1999
were delayed by 1-2 months at Pacific
Grove. Although the events in 1929
and 1976 were statistically significant
based on the Wilcoxon rank sum test,
the events in 1939 and 1999 were not.
Application of standard tests of
significance for regime shifts may
be problematic because the changes
of interest are often relatively small
and do not necessarily occur in a
single step. However, our results
suggest that tests of significance
based on pattern recognition could
be developed using the CUSUM signatures
that characterize regime shifts since
they are distinct and repeatable.
In conclusion, the evidence for nonuniform
heating in Monterey Bay over the past
century is strong, and a step-wise
model based on regime changes that
produce the steps provides a reasonable
explanation for how the warming process
has occurred.
Larry Breaker writes: "Overall,
we observe periods of apparent regime
stability that are decadal to interdecadal
in scale, separated by regime shifts
that do not occur instantaneously
but have time scales of six months
or so."
|